Message from the CEO (1 Nov 2021)

Message from the CEO


Welcome to the next edition of The VET Sector newsletter.

This edition is jam-packed with useful information, informative articles, practical to-do suggestions, our professional experiences, and much more

As always, we are inviting you to email us your thoughts, feedback, and suggestions for topics to be included in our next newsletters and e-magazines.

We are searching for contributors to the next edition of our newsletter, The VET Sector, which will be published in November. Specifically, we are looking for articles that need to be updated in light of impending events or new developments in the compliance and quality, government laws and legislative changes, as well as training and education industries.

Contact us via email if you have a topic you want to see included or questions you need answering.

Regards,
Sukh Sandhu

Advertise with us @ The VET Sector

The VET Sector is a digital magazine and newsletter that has been developed to promote and provide information about opportunities in the VET sector and increase awareness of changes affecting the industry.

We hope that through our newsletter and e-magazine, we can provide the information that the vocational education and training sector needs and long term help build a future with better outcomes for students.

The publication has been developed with input from leading experts in the vocational education and training sector and has quickly established itself as an important source of information for trainers and assessors, managers, admin staff and others working in vocational education and training.

The benefits of advertising with us are:

  • We are a dedicated vocational education and training sector service
  • We have thousands of subscribers
  • Your advertisements will help you and our readers to get information about the products and services they need for their work.

So who should be advertising in The VET Sector?

There will be a section for:

  • VET Consultants
  • Buying and selling RTOs
  • Advertising job vacancies
  • Advertising courses and professional development sessions

We accept any education and training related materials for advertising purposes in our VET Sector newsletter and e-magazine.

For more information about our services, please contact our sales and inquiries team.

If you are looking to place your ads on the website or want to advertise through our newsletter and magazine, please contact us at:
info@thevetsector.com

The Top 10 VET Sector websites and resources – you must know!

There are numerous resources available on the internet that you can use to make your life easier. Google, Wikipedia, YouTube, and Amazon are just a few of the websites that receive a lot of traffic. These websites make it simple to browse the internet and offer all of the information you require right at your fingertips.

Here are some valuable websites that you can use to better understand and learn more about the Vocational Education and Training Sector.

ASQA

The Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) is a government agency and a national VET regulator tasked with ensuring the quality of vocational education and training in Australia. It was established to ensure that VET is delivered to a high standard, in accordance with its regulatory framework and governance procedures.

The ASQA website serves as an ‘Educator Toolkit,’ providing educators with resources, advice, forms, fact sheets, frequently asked questions and other materials relating to vocational education and training (VET). ASQA is always upgrading its website, and in the last few days, it has included a plethora of new instructive and educational material.

It is a valuable source of information for learners, parents, career counsellors, educators, policymakers, and the industry.

VRQA

Victoria’s Registration and Qualifications Authority (VRQA) has the responsibility of enforcing regulations that assure the quality of education and training in the Victorian state, as well as promoting informed decision-making when it comes to vocational education and training.

TAC

Located in Perth, Western Australia, the Training Accreditation Council (TAC or the Council) is an independent, statutory agency responsible for the quality assurance and recognition of vocational education and training (VET) services in the state. The Vocational Education and Training Council was founded under the Vocational Education and Training Act 1996.

They have some really helpful materials including comprehensive user guides, fact sheets and frequently asked questions on their website https://www.tac.wa.gov.au/StandardsRTOs2015/Pages/default.aspx.

Training.gov.au (TGA)

Training.gov.au is a national register where industry stakeholders can find information related to the current, superseded and deleted training products.

Additionally, it allows users to subscribe to updates on training packages, qualifications, units, skill sets, and accredited courses (Nationally Recognised Training) and receive email notifications when that information is updated.

Training.gov.au, the national register, also maintains a complete list of RTOs and their contact detail, scope of registration etc

My Skills Website

My Skills is an Australian Government initiative that aims to provide training consumers with up-to-date, transparent, unbiased, and trustworthy information to assist them in making informed decisions about their training options.

My Skills, as the national directory of vocational education and training (VET) organisations and courses, aims to improve the quality and accessibility of information available to VET consumers by enabling them to search for and compare VET courses and training providers.

National Careers Institute

The National Careers Institute (NCI) is responsible for providing Australians with credible and accurate career information, resources, and support.

NCI’s aim is to be Australia’s primary independent source of career information for Australians of all ages and all stages of their professional career.

NCVER

Australia’s National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) is a non-profit organisation that promotes research into the vocational education and training sector in Australia and serves as a funding source for research into that area.

VOCED Plus

VOCEDplus is a free international research database for tertiary education, with a focus on workforce needs and requirements, skills development, and social inclusion. It is available to anyone anywhere in the world.

It comprises higher education, adult and community education, informal learning, and VET in schools. The database is global in scope, and it has approximately 80,000 English-language records, many of which have links to full-text documents.

The Department of Education, Skills and Employment

It is the mission of the Department of Education, Skills, and Employment to ensure that all Australians have access to the well-being and economic benefits that quality education, skills, and employment can offer.

AQF

The Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) is the policy framework for regulated qualifications in the Australian education and training system. This framework was first introduced in 1995 to serve as the foundation for Australia’s national system of qualifications, which includes higher education, vocational education and training (VET), as well as schools. It is the policy that has been agreed upon by Commonwealth, State, and Territory ministers.


What websites do you know that have been really beneficial to you and would like us to consider including them in our future edition of helpful websites? Please contact us via email at info@caqa.com.au.

 

 

Landmark VET reforms to drive our skills-led economic future

A fundamental overhaul of Australia’s vocational education and training (VET) system has been agreed to by the Morrison Government and states and territories. The reforms are an important achievement and will improve the performance, efficiency, transparency and confidence in the VET sector, ensuring Australians can access high quality and relevant training and employers can access the skilled workers they need.

The new Industry Clusters model—as groups of aligned industries—will replace the 67 Industry Reference Committees and six Skills Service Organisations and are expected to be fully operational by 1 January 2023. The reforms will ensure courses and qualifications in the sector are driven by and better meet the needs of industry, as well as students.

Training package approval processes will also change, with an independent assurance function to replace the Australian Industry and Skills Committee by 1 January 2023.

The Morrison Government is investing $292.5 million over the next four years to support the reforms—building on the record $6.4 billion investment made by the Morrison Government in skills and training this financial year.

Minister for Employment, Workforce, Skills, Small and Family Business, Stuart Robert, said the reforms will drive system improvements, ensure qualifications are updated faster so they meet the needs of industry and help students upskill or reskill for new and emerging jobs.

‘As Australia’s economy roars back we need a skills and training system that is well positioned to meet our evolving workforce needs into the future,’ Minister Robert said.

‘Australia’s economic future relies on a VET system that works for students and employers, which is why industry engagement is so important as part of our skills-led recovery,’

‘The new Industry Clusters will strengthen employer leadership and engagement, giving industry a broader, more strategic role ensuring Australia’s VET system addresses skills and workforce challenges across the economy, including labour demands, as we reopen strongly.’

‘This is a significant milestone as we work constructively with states and territories to complete the transformation of the VET system and progress further reforms.’

More details can be found at: www.dese.gov.au/skills-reform

This material comes from the originating organization/author(s)and may be of a point-in-time nature, edited for clarity, style and length. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s). View in full here.

Interview with David Jepsen, Founder and Principal of RTO Accountants

With over 25 years’ experience as a practicing CA, David is the Founder and Principal of RTO Accountants. David started his career at KPMG, moving onto mid tier accounting firms and commercial roles with Citigroup, Zurich, CBA and others in Sydney and London before setting up an accounting practice in 2001. Offering commercial and practical advice, David believes the foundation for business success is built upon strong, trusted and lasting client partnerships.

David is commercially minded and works collaboratively with clients to develop strategies and solutions for complex business challenges. Having worked in accounting firms as well as public and private businesses, David has a breadth of experience in accounting, taxation, business advisory, financial control/CFO roles, ensuring his clients receive top-level, expert advice.

Specialising in the VET/CRICOS/ELICOS sector since 2016, he has extensive experience working with RTO’s. Specific areas of experience include sales due diligence work, tax advice on sales and other, business group structuring, board reporting, financial viability risk assessment requirements (FVRAR) and business advice.

David loves his sport and played rugby for many years, he still follows the game at all levels from club to international closely. He now enjoys getting outdoors all year round to train and compete in kayak races.


Sukh Sandhu: How long have you been assisting RTOs with financial viability risk assessments, and what has your overall experience been like in this field?

David Jepsen: We have been working with RTO’s since 2014 and financial viabilities from 2018, which was just prior to the introduction of the version of the FVRA Tool we still work with now. The FVRA Requirements were very basic and the introduction of the new requirements in 2018, was like moving from 2 to 9 out of 10 in terms of financial reporting complexity. The sector was not accustomed to this level of financial reporting; I still see issues with that, though I think the sector is getting accustomed to this and the need for this.

The FVRAR and its Tool are complex; as qualified accountants it took us many hours and late nights to get our heads around it and learn its nuances, this is a process for us that never stops.

Sukh Sandhu: What are the five most common mistakes people make when completing the financial viability risk assessment packs, and how can they be avoided?

David Jepsen: I will start with saying we have an initial meeting with clients prior to them starting work on financials and we prepare the Tool for our clients to avoid these mistakes. The client owns and knows the RTO and its plan, though we address and guide our clients on our area of specialisation early to make the process effective and simple for the client.

1. Business Plan or other information available to ASQA contradicts the FVRA Tool.

Solution (S): Get your signing accountant to review the business plan and directors be mindful to understand if changes in the forecast affect other documents.

2. Over emphasis on the bank balance to prove viability.

Solution (S): Provide a financial guarantee and evidence of available liquid assets to fund the RTO; proving the RTO has access to funds. Funds can easily and quickly be deposited or withdrawn from an account.

3. Over optimistic forecasting; higher revenues and lower costs to make the RTO more profitable.

Solution (S): be realistic, even conservative and consider all costs and choose a mid range of student numbers and not the best scenario. Business start ups are rarely profitable and take time to grow and make a profit; accountants and auditors are aware of this.

4. Incorrect and incomplete Tools; the various sheets do not reconcile and/or are not completed correctly; leads to a Tool with a red light and automatic rejection.

Solution (S): We only see these issues when the tool is done by the director’s or another advisor and RTO Accountants are brought into review. Working with an accounting firm experienced with the Tool is the solution, alternatively spend a lot of time and hopefully get it correct.

There is a lot to consider including future, actual, historical financial and operational information that reconciles. Forecasting the balance sheet and cash flow in software and not excel. Accurate financial reporting of this complexity is difficult even for qualified accountants using specialised forecasting software.

5. Forecasting Accuracy

Solution (S): It is a forecast of the future, no matter what you do it will not be 100% correct; consider all the information currently available to you and find a comfortable balance in the level of detail, we can guide you.

Sukh Sandhu: We understand that you also assist organisations with the selling and purchase of RTOs; could you perhaps elaborate a little more for our subscribers?

David Jepsen: For sellers we can help to clarify or prove the value of your RTO via forecasting and a valuation of the RTO. We can provide a report on this that improves the sale process for you; attracting more buyers and a higher price as you are able to articulate the RTO value via this document and discussions. The report can be presented to brokers and potential buyers.

For buyers it is usually Due Diligence (DD) work on the RTO you are considering acquiring. The potential scope of Due Diligence work is very broad as its ultimate objective is to ensure the RTO financial position is as the seller’s state in their financials; the process is like a financial audit. We want to check that you are buying the RTO you think you are. The scope of work is discussed and decided with the client and can change through the process. Many buyers don’t undertake DD as it is a cost that may be large compared to the purchase price; the potential consequences and costs of not undertaking DD when you purchase a RTO can be much larger than the purchase value as the buyer inherits the past of the RTO including any compliance, legal and financial issues, and risks. Our DD findings have saved clients millions. There are many examples including:

  • A $200k RTO purchase we discovered that the RTO had not paid tax or GST for years and the new owners would be responsible for the $150k; the buyers purchase cost is doubled once penalties are included
  • In another DD the RTO was accounting for training revenue on a cash basis prior to training delivery and therefore it looked more profitable than it was. Once discovered the sale price was renegotiated from $1m to $750k; $250k savings.

DD work prior to the purchase is more effective than resolving via enforcement of the share sale contract post sale. Enforcement of the share agreement is difficult and includes directors time, court costs and an unknown outcome. Our due diligence work is focussed on the financials, and we work with other specialists on the DD. Engaging RTO specialist lawyers and consultants should be considered.

DD can also be done for sellers, though is less common. It is more likely to happen if the seller is relying on the new owner’s performance; for example, if the sale includes an ‘earn out’ whereby the sale proceeds will depend on the performance post change of ownership, you want to ensure the buyer will keep the RTO profitable.

Sukh Sandhu: What are the most significant financial risks that training organisations face in today’s environment?

David Jepsen: It depends on the RTO of course, though broadly speaking COVID still looms large for me as a risk to business and the economy for some time, I hope we have seen the worst of it. The last 18 months turned out better than many RTO’s envisaged as they cut costs, received Government support for their business and education became an economic priority and recovery plan that has led to funding of training. I know many colleges have not been so lucky, especially those exposed to international students.

General Government support of the economy, such as Jobkeeper, Jobsaver and disaster payments will be withdrawn and that may also pose risks to the economy and perhaps then student expenditure on courses.

From history we know that funding of training can be withdrawn quickly and that is a risk that directors should remain aware of and have plans in place for.

The regulator has been subdued in its compliance actions since January 2020 and I think that may change as they start to conduct monitoring reviews on inactive or suspected non-compliant RTO’s.

Management and understanding of the RTO operations and financial position, to ensure that you are making a profit and are cash flow positive in the medium to long term. There can be a race to the bottom in reducing student fees against competitors and you need to ensure the fees you are charging will cover your operations and provide the owners with a return on their investment.

Sukh Sandhu: When it comes to working with the national regulatory authority, how has your experience been?

David Jepsen: I have had meetings with the regulator on the FVRAR; that took a little time to organise though they were productive meetings.

Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) attendance to defend a client’s financial viability against the regulators legal team and forensic accountants. The outcome for the client was favourable, though being questioned by a legal team is never too much fun, though it was challenging and satisfying to explain the financials in that environment.

Recently the regulator seems more communicative and proactive regarding its role and how they will undertake that role, hopefully we will see this in its actions going forward.

Sukh Sandhu: Are there any suggestions you would like to offer to people who are interested in getting into the RTO industry?

David Jepsen: It is a regulated sector as education is a matter of public interest and therefore there will be scrutiny on your affairs and how you intend to operate your business and maintain financial viability. This level of scrutiny will mean setup takes more time and costs more. Most sectors do not have this scrutiny; though writing a business plan and a financial forecast would help all start-up businesses and deter those not ready for the responsibilities of running a business.

Buyers of an RTO business need to get to know the sector and do your due diligence. Training is a happy and positive sector, the conferences are enjoyable, the people involved care about their students/clients.

As the accountant I have to say businesses have a responsibility to society, their clients, staff, suppliers, and other counterparts. For all the efforts and stress please ensure you make a decent return out of it. Understand your financials, risks and what you are making from the business, get regular reporting not just once a year.


For those who wish to connect with or follow David Jepsen, you can do so via his Linkedin, here – www.linkedin.com/in/david-jepsen

Interview with Peter Doukas – Managing Director, Denison Toyer Education Lawyers

Peter owns and operates Sydney based education law firm Denison Toyer.

Working in the field of Education Law and Corporate Governance since 2007 Peter has acted for over one hundred Registered Training Organisations and Higher Education Providers in various stages of the education management cycle. He routinely acts for colleges in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and provides extensive advice to RTO Management, Higher Education providers, Educational Conglomerates and Universities. His professional practice also includes providing legal and governance advice to listed and unlisted company boards. He has acted in some of the largest cases involving ASQA in the AAT.

Peter is also active in the multicultural space and acts as a volunteer director on various boards. He is the current chair of the Ethnic Communities’ Council of NSW. He also works providing pro-bono legal assistance to new and emerging communities, particularly in the establishment of associations and governance structures within NSW.

Peter was awarded Honour of Member of the Order of Australia for services to Multiculturalism on Australia Day 2020.


Here is a copy of Peter Doukas’s interview with Sukh Sandhu:

Thank you, Sukh for the opportunity to be part of the publication. I think it is exceptional that you have maintained the publication throughout the COVID period and it is in my view has never been a more critical time in the history of VET to properly liaise with the sector in all its shapes and sizes and the publication does this.

What are the top five genuine reasons for a regulatory body to take strict action against a training provider?

This is an interesting question. The word ‘genuine’ is something that has troubled representatives in the profession and around the sector for the last 10 years. What constitutes a genuine problem or a genuine reason for a regulatory body (any regulatory body) to take strict action against the Training Provider. The unique example of VET is one which we should bear in mind moving forward as it is the current question before us. In my view, strict action including sanctions should be the last resort. By sanction I mean the sanction of either cancellation, suspension or any other form of sanction which directly affects the ability of the organisation to trade. In my view, there are a number of items where such strict action should be taken. These include but are not limited to:

  • Criminal conduct by the Provider
  • Conduct that is not criminal but unlawful such as breaching the provisions of the NVR Act. If it is proven however to a criminal standard.
  • The use of the VET framework to further commercial interests. It has occurred routinely that I have seen individuals (either Providers and non Providers) use the mere fact of the highly regulated VET environment to further their commercial interests when pursuing them against an RTO.
  • When there are examples of mistreatment of students. This is an extension to the student centred approach that ASQA has taken in the recent past in which in my view students and their experience while studying in our VET Sector should be prioritised above all else.

When should RTO representatives seek the advice of a legal professional?

The question of when a RTO representative should engage a legal professional has plagued me for some time. I have too often been brought into cases that have been run or attempted to be run by Providers without the involvement of a lawyer. This ends up costing Providers exponentially more and in some cases the problems are too large to fix before a sanction either takes effect or can possibly be unwound. In my view is prudent for an RTO to permanently retain (this does not need to be on a financial basis) a lawyer or law firm for the sole purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a lawyer ‘on the books’ it would make the function of dealing with sanctions or any inquiries from the regulator more easy. We must remember, the VET Sector is a highly regulated environment and a VET Provider particularly a CRICOS Provider operates in the framework of multiple interlocking contracts, agreements and regulatory requirements. The idea that RTOs could go along without having legal advice outside of leasing and other contracts on an Ad-hoc basis is not realistic. For larger Providers I strongly recommend the establishment of a Board of Directors of which a retained lawyer and compliance expert sit as advisors to this Board (not necessarily Directors) but provide routine advice on compliance and on structures of the business of VET delivery.

This question is an extension to the previous question, in what ways can a legal practitioner, such as yourself, assist an RTO who is experiencing a legal problem with the regulatory body?

To answer the question about how a lawyer can address the problem facing a regulatory body or facing a registered training organisation is not as appropriate in my view as to when to involve that person. We in this Sector operate in a very unique regulatory framework. ASQA as a regulator has to face Providers which for the most part try to do the right thing but often find themselves on the wrong side of regulation or audits. I have seen on many occasions legal practitioners in some cases from very large firms find themselves completely out of their depth with regards to the implementation of the NVR Act and audit reports as part of regulatory functions. I have noticed the impact of regulatory decisions that have been taken by the regulator not being properly addressed either due to fellow practitioners not fully understanding the way the NVR Act works nor the way that AAT matters should be run. AAT litigation in the RTO space is unique and is very rarely dealt with by legal practitioners operating outside of the RTO space. There are a number of lawyers in Australia who have experience in these matters and I would encourage RTO owners to seek out lawyers who actually have acted in the AAT and ideally brought a matter to final hearing. It is not enough to simply ask a lawyer when shopping around ‘have you taken an RTO to the AAT?’. The real questions that need to be asked is whether:

  • The lawyer has taken a matter to final hearing
  • They have run a contested stay application; and
  • They have conciliated an outcome to the benefit of the RTO.

As you would have noticed, there was a time when RTOs were being cancelled left, right, and centre for trivial reasons that had no or little influence on students. Do you still witness the same pattern, or have the processes been improved?

I think the Regulator’s processes have improved dramatically in the last 18 months. In my view, the Regulator has made a genuine attempt to engage with the Sector and have as an outcome a collaborative and collegiate system of compliance and regulation. Also, it must be said that there were quite a few more RTOs at the beginning of 2018 than there are today. This can partly be due to the cancellation of many in between 2018 and 2019 and also of course a result of the impacts of COVID-19. In 2018 and for most of 2019 I remember running at least one stay hearing each week. This was a time when RTOs were being shut or sanctioned as a result of audit reports that didn’t really hit the mark. There are a number of factors I believe that have changed this. Some of which include some significant wins for RTOs and in final hearing before the AAT,other factors involve the change in perspective from ASQA to a more collaborative model of compliance. I think it can be said generally that the RTO space we are going into in 2022 is fundamentally different from the RTO space that we had in 2019. I am excited at how the Sector will look because I think that we now have a Regulator who can see the value of a competitive, compliant but confident VET Sector that isn’t always looking over its shoulder.

What are the primary reasons for the departure of so many people from the vocational education and training industry?

The departure of people from the Vocational Industry I believe will be reflected as one of the most dramatic and problematic events in Australian commercial history. I have a colleague who is looking to conduct a PhD in Vocational Education and is unable to find a supervisor. It is the case that people have left the VET Sector and found opportunities elsewhere for many reasons, but central is the lack of focus that has been placed at the sector at a policy level. RTO owners shutting or selling their RTO’s tell me that they have lost faith or lost confidence in the Sector. I have worked tirelessly to try to convince people to remain within the Sector and either keep their colleges open or at least keep themselves in the space in some way. I believe that we are about to embark on a significant period of growth in VET and we need as many experienced operators as possible. This is due in part to the combination of a skills shortage in Australia and the gradual opening of our borders to international students.

Any legal advice you’d want to share with people who are interested in entering into the RTO industry or who are currently operating in the industry would be greatly appreciated.

My view is that VET is about to take off. Unfortunately, I am looking to the government to support the Sector and support the entrance of people into the Sector. When I say government, I do not mean the Regulator but education policymakers in Canberra. We need to remember that international education is either our second or third largest export market depending on the context. Could you imagine what would occur if mining in Australia had experienced the nearly 30 per cent decline in people working in the Industry? This is VET since 2019. I believe government should look both into the push and pull factors affecting how people engage with the Sector. They have certainly addressed the push factors by the reforms of the Regulator and I think that now finally ASQA has the framework of a forward-thinking and flexible Regulator in a competitive international market which can finally be compared to Regulators in other Anglosphere jurisdictions such as Canada, New Zealand or the United Kingdom.

As to the pull factors, I believe that we really need to focus on trainers and RTO owners. These are the people who dedicate huge chunks of their life to the training of VET Students and it is these people who need our support and credit in what I hope will be a re-emergence of our VET Sector.


For those who wish to connect with or follow Peter Doukas, you can do so via his Linkedin, here – www.linkedin.com/in/peter-doukas/

Message from the CEO

Message from the CEO


We need to make sure we eliminate any issues that lead to decreased student engagement and an increase in drop-out rates. We need to think about and execute support for students who want to complete a VET qualification and follow their interests or passion. Coming out of lockdown, we will need to move to a stable economy where our graduates have the knowledge or skills that employers need.

This month we are launching our “Your questions and our answers series”, a free webinar on the last Friday of the month between 12 to 1 PM. If you have questions do not hesitate to send them to us and we will try to answer as many of them as possible during the live sessions. We have more information in the “Your questions and our answers series” article. Join us for an hour of free compliance education! All attendees will receive certificates of attendance from us.

As always, if you require assistance in any way, please contact us via email at info@caqa.com.au.

Sukh Sandhu
CEO

Online learning – Understanding the learner experience continuum

Online learning has become one of the most used forms of learning in the VET sector. It is a flexible and convenient way for people to learn new skills, knowledge, and information.

Learning online is a process that many organisations are starting to take more seriously. They are trying to figure out how to best support learners in their learning journey by providing them with suitable tools.

This type of education takes place in various forms like e-Learning, blended learning, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), and distance learning. Learners are moving towards online learning due to its flexibility and convenience. Some learners may feel more comfortable with social interactions while others prefer to work on their own without any interaction to achieve their goals.

Different organisations work differently with learners as they move through stages. For example, some organisations give learners autonomy and encourage them to figure out what’s best for them, while others provide guidance and support for their learner journey.

There are different degrees and types of online courses that can be taken by learners. Some courses might be completely passive while others might require active participation from the learner like answering questions or providing feedback to teachers. Learners can take online courses at different levels with varying degrees of interactivity. While some organisations take care of all levels of learners, there are other organisations that offer specific services depending on a learner’s needs and preferences.

The learner experience continuum


The learner experience continuum is a way to visualise and explore the different stages of online learning and the role that organisations play in them.


The learner experience continuum refers to the different stages of online learning from no or little interactivity to comprehensive self-directed learning where learners are engaged and contributing comprehensively to their learning journey.

The different stages of online learning

The different stages of online learning include:

Stage 1: no interactivity – learners are given content through PDF files, word copies of these documents are uploaded online. This stage only includes the passive form of learning that happens by simply reading or watching an image or video that has been produced by someone else’s expertise in one particular subject matter.

Stage 2: low interactivity – Visual and audio tools are used, followed by quizzes or assessments that help them improve their knowledge of the material. The information is presented using text format rather than PDF and word copies, the learner can bookmark what they have read and where to continue next time they commence their reading, learners can watch content, try out interactive drills, watch videos, etc

Stage 3: Low social learning – where learners interact with peers in groups or one-to-one, who are also working to learn about a topic or gain understanding in a certain area. This is very similar to the traditional classroom setting.

Stage 4: High social interactivity – immersive and collaborative. – where learners can connect with people who have expertise in fields they know little about and explore topics working as a team in any real business setting. The interactivity in the learning processes can be achieved through each of the following methods:

  • 360 photos
  • 360 videos
  • Interactive virtual reality (VR)
  • Facial recognition
  • Student trainer interactivity
  • Powerpoint
  • Search engine

This stage also includes active participation in social learning networks and activities. This stage can also include the use of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual reality, gamification and other technological advancements.

Please note: There are many other stages that organisations provide for their learners. These include self-paced courses, self-directed learning, assessment-based courses, blended theory and practice courses, etc.

This continuum can be used in different ways to help learners through the specific phases and stages – knowledge transfer, informal learning and formal learning. Training organisations often help learners during these phases by providing content support to help them in the knowledge transfer phase. They also provide feedback and coaching for informal learner interactions and they have assigned mentors or experts who can provide guidance in the formal learner interaction phase.

Why should you read and share THE VET SECTOR newsletter?

The purpose of this newsletter is to maintain an ongoing dialogue with the industry representatives, giving them a voice and platform to raise their concerns and practices.

The importance of this newsletter is not only because it has a lot of subscribers but also because without the right information, one cannot be an active participant in the industry. If you want to be informed about the latest trends and news, then subscribe to this newsletter.

Do you know that your trainers and assessors can use this newsletter for their VET currency?

Yes, you read it right. The VET Sector newsletter is a great way for trainers and assessors to maintain their industry currency and VET currency as well. The newsletter can be used as a training tool to create, generate, and share new ideas. It’s a great way to share knowledge, engage with others, provide valuable content that is relevant to the industry, and upsell new skill sets ahead of time.

We include a number of articles in this newsletter that are focused on staying current with what’s happening in the industry. These articles give them a quick overview of what’s new in the world of training, such as recent developments in technology, emerging practices, and emerging skills. These articles also cover specific topics related to training and assessment, including assessments and performance reviews, current regulatory practices, ideas for training sessions focused on motivational strategies, tips for designing effective learning programs using video tools, and how to create an effective learning program using games and so on.

Not only because this newsletter has one of the biggest subscribers in Australia but it is also important to ensure that you have access to the right information, you use this information for your industry currency, you share the information that is written by Industry experts with your team members.


So please share and subscribe to this newsletter online or send an email to info@caqa.com.au and we will include you on our subscription list.

ASQA publishes scoping study on VET in schools

The scoping study on vocational education and training delivered to secondary school students was issued by the national regulating agency in order to protect the quality of VET delivery.

It is ASQA’s role as national regulator for VET to work in partnership with training providers to guarantee compliance with the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2015.

In response to the findings of the study, ASQA has stated that they have committed to the following activities to assist the continuous improvement of vocational education and training (VET) in the schools:

  1. provide clearer guidance to assist compliance
  2. work with other VET regulators to identify risks
  3. engage more directly with education departments and schools
  4. engage with states and territories on shared risk, promotion of continuous improvement
  5. apply clause 1.6 of the Standards for RTOs (The RTO implements a range of strategies for industry engagement and systematically uses the outcome of that industry engagement to ensure the industry relevance of:
    • its training and assessment strategies, practices and resources; and
    • the current industry skills of its trainers and assessors.)

It is also recommended that the Australian, state, and territory governments evaluate how the observations made in this scoping study might assist in enhancing the effectiveness and continuous improvement of VETDSSS when drafting the new National Skills Agreement.

You can read more information at asqa.gov.au/news-events

Strategies to maintain VET and Industry currency as a trainer and assessor

The VET industry is changing rapidly, therefore, trainers and assessors need to continuously update their skills, knowledge and competencies to work effectively in the training and education industry.

Industry currency refers to trainers and assessors who keep current knowledge, skills, and experience of current workplace industrial practises in the industry sector in which they teach. This is crucial to ensuring that all training is current with industry standards and that students get the most up-to-date technical skills and information applicable to their area. It is a dynamic method of ensuring that the quality of training courses offered to students continues to improve.

The quality of the training and assessment is dependent on the skills and knowledge of the trainers and assessors. The Standards specify that trainers and assessors must be skilled VET practitioners with current industry skills and knowledge. This will ensure that students receive the training required and are properly assessed before being issued with a qualification or statement of attainment.

Let’s start with the vocational competency requirements for trainers and assessors.

The definition of vocational competency

Vocational competency in a particular industry consists of broad industry knowledge and experience, usually combined with a relevant industry qualification. A person who has vocational competency will be familiar with the content of the vocation and will have relevant current experience in the industry. Vocational competencies must be considered on an industry-by-industry basis and with reference to the guidance provided in the assessment guidelines of the relevant training package. (Reference: NCVER)

A clear and verified relationship between the trainer’s and assessor’s formal and informal training and experience and the qualifications/units they deliver and assess must be established. Training Packages include specific industry advice related to the vocational competencies of assessors. This may include advice on relevant industry qualifications and experience required for assessing against the Training Package. The Training Package will also provide specific industry advice outlining what it sees as acceptable forms of evidence to demonstrate the maintenance of currency of vocational competency.

ASQA Guidelines on “vocational competence”:

To provide training that reflects current industry practice and valid assessment, your RTO’s trainers and assessors must maintain the currency of their skills and knowledge in both:

  • their industry area and,
  • vocational education and training.

It is also acceptable for an appropriately qualified trainer and assessor to work with an industry expert to conduct assessments together.

The three C’s of Vocational competency related to demonstrating skills and knowledge in an “industry area”

Vocational competence and currency = Broad industry knowledge + experience + relevant industry qualification in terms of:

  1. Content: How have you determined that you know how to do the job of the qualifications you deliver and assess?
  2. Context: Does this information clearly show the relationship between what you are delivering and what you have experience in?
  3. Currency: How up-to-date are you with current work practices in your industry and how do you find out if something is changing or has changed?

Skills and knowledge in an “industry area”

In many situations, trainers and assessors will hold the qualification and/or units of competency that they deliver or assess. Where this is not the case, equivalence needs to be established.

  • Formal vocational education and training qualification/units of competency you deliver and assess
  • Participate in documented mapping activities to demonstrate you have at least the required level of knowledge and skills.

The definition of industry currency

Industry currency and professional knowledge refer to the competence of an individual to perform their job role. The knowledge required in an occupation does not remain static, so employees need to continuously update their skills. As vocational education and training (VET) practitioners train the individuals entering these occupations, it is important for them to ensure that their industry knowledge and skills are current.

A clear and verified relationship between the trainer’s and assessor’s current industry skills and knowledge and the qualifications/units they deliver and assess must be established. This is to ensure the trainer and assessor has “current” knowledge and skills in terms of emerging technological innovations, regulatory and legislative changes and shifts in client demands. The industry usually does not use the term “industry currency”. For them it is either “professional competence” to encompass the concepts of currency, updating and upskilling or “industry relevance”, defining it as a solid grounding in the industry gained from being trained and employed in the industry.

ASQA Guidelines on industry currency:

To provide training that reflects current industry practice and valid assessment, your RTO’s trainers and assessors must maintain the currency of their skills and knowledge in both:

  • their industry area and,
  • vocational education and training.

It is also acceptable for an appropriately qualified trainer and assessor to work with an industry expert to conduct assessments together.

How to stay up-to-date in terms of “industry currency”

In many situations, trainers and assessors may be working in the industry sector and this can be used as evidence for industry currency. Where this is not the case, currency needs to be established through different mediums such as:

  • Attending trade events, workshops, conferences, technical seminars and other industrial events
  • Reading industry magazines and journals (subscription and notes taken)
  • Undertaking online research (and have documented logs of these activities)
  • Engaging in industry networks
  • Participating in LinkedIn groups
  • Product manufacturer/vendor training

Factors that influence industry currency

  • Technology innovation
  • Changing legislation and regulatory requirements
  • Changes to industry practice
  • New and emerging skills and specialisations as work practices change
  • Technical skills being outdated through periods of non-use

What is “industry current or currency period”

Each RTO has to consider the relevant factors, ideally in consultation with industry, to determine an appropriate currency period. A lot will depend on how static the industry is or how fast it is developing and changing. In general, anything that is 2 years old, or more will not be considered current.

The definition of vocational education and training currency

VET currency refers to the competence of an individual to work in the vocational education and training sector.

Current VET trainers/assessors must:

Develop knowledge and practice of vocational training and assessment, including competency-based training and assessment competencies through continual professional development.
Undertake professional development that contributes to the demonstration of vocational training and learning requirements

How to stay up-to-date in terms of VET currency

  • Subscribing to VET and RTO newsletters and magazines. Make sure you keep a PD log of what you read, where you read it, what you learned and how you implemented the learning.
  • Participation in VET forums and discussions such as LinkedIn.
  • Participation in VET seminars, conferences and workshops (particularly the ones delivered by the regulatory bodies)
  • Enrolling in PD courses and workshops for RTO staff
  • Participation in resource writing and validation

Licensing requirements for trainers and assessors

If licensing requirements vary from the training package requirements, RTOs must ensure that all aspects of the training package are met. License requirements should be considered in addition to the requirements for the training package. For example, a white card is a mandatory work card required in Australia to be able to train and assess students working on a construction site.

Maintenance of industry and VET currency are critical components of one’s professional identity because it enables trainers and assessors to modify training as needed to provide more relevant learning and assessment activities for students and to use real-world examples that are tailored to the needs and requirements of a particular industry. This not only increases the quality of training for students but also contributes to the development of industry ties and confidence in VET courses.

CAQA Online forums, CAQA Info for maintaining your compliance and regulatory knowledge

CAQA Online forums provide information for RTO professionals. The purpose of the forums is to support compliance and regulatory knowledge with the help of other professionals in the field.

Some of the benefits of subscribing to our online forums are that it provides access to knowledge sharing and networking opportunities among peers in the vocational education and training industry. You can also get information on what’s new in the industry through the online community.

The following is an example of how discussions in CAQA online forums can help:

When you are looking for answers to questions on topics like compliance, regulation, red tape etc., you can search for them on online forums or look at similar threads on different platforms. The best part is that all these discussions are available to a number of VET experts so you will get answers from real people rather than bots or system-generated answers!

The other benefits include:

-Receive timely notifications when important information is posted.
-Get access to exclusive content and offers from the sponsors and members of the forum.
-Post comments and create discussions with other members in order to build your knowledge base and stay current with current trends in the industry.

So, again, why not subscribe? Online forums provide an opportunity for you to stay up-to-date with the latest compliance and regulatory news. It also ensures that you make use of your knowledge by discussing different topics with other professionals in real-time.

To access CAQA Online Forums, please visit http://www.caqa.info

Interview – Andrew Shea – CEO, Builders Academy Australia

Andrew is an educational and business professional and known intrapreneur who specialises in leading high performing teams, optimising business processes and quality assurance and compliance frameworks. He is a proven transformational leader and has successfully fulfilled managerial and leadership positions across a range of industries.

Areas of specialisation include:

♦ C-Suite executive across ASX and non-ASX businesses
♦ Experienced Chair
♦ Conference speaker
♦ Governance, audit and risk specialist
♦ Not for Profit Board member
♦ Business improvement and compliance advisor
♦ Tertiary Education digital marketing advisor

Over the last 15 years, Andrew has managed and/or consulted with a number some of Australia’s best known Registered Training Organisation’s. As a teacher by trade, he for has personally delivered training and coaching sessions to over 2000 individuals over this time.

In addition to his organisation development and leadership capabilities, Andrew is well recognised in relation to his instructional design and course development capabilities having developed high quality training and assessment materials in the fields of Hospitality, Security, OH&S, Construction, Training and Assessment, Business Management and Leadership.

Andrew has a thorough knowledge of both challenges experienced by training organisations and also industry best practice having led a number of award winning training providers.


1. When it comes to your work as the Chief Executive Officer of two Registered Training Organisation’s that have been recognised with multiple awards, what lessons are there for other providers in what you have learnt in your role?

I am really proud of the recognition that our team at Builders Academy Australia and CWBTS has received across a number of years including being recognised multiple times as the Victorian Training Provider of the Year, NSW finalist for Training Provider of the Year, and last year as the Australian Small Training Provider of the Year at the Australian Training Awards.
Despite our growth and recognition for innovation, quality and great outcomes, we have not necessarily focussed on building our business, but instead on building the capacity of our people, and in-turn, our fantastic team has then helped to grow our business and help more students across Australia through embedding innovative practice whilst maintaining quality outcomes.
We are pleased that we have been able to sustain quality outcomes for our students and employer partners for a number of years, despite the challenges from Covid-19 restrictions and these outcomes have been supported by maintaining a deep understanding of who our students are, the motivations they have towards completing their studies, and embedding industry engagement, and current and future industry skills into all content that we deliver. Through utilisation virtual reality and 3-d walkthroughs of actual building sites as part of our virtual classroom delivery model, we were able to continue to support students despite Covid-19 related limitations for periods.

My team has been proud to showcase that a focus on people, while being a for profit organisation, are not mutually exclusive measures of success in the training system. In 2020/2021, our agile business model, responsive staff and well-developed virtual learning platform has meant that not a single student has missed a training session due to COVID-19. Even the most kinaesthetic of learners has benefitted because of our real commitment to replicating on-site experience, student success and quality outcomes.

I think that maintaining a focus on what industry needs, and reverse engineering our learning and assessment strategies around how we can best support students to achieve those outcomes has had us well placed. We also deeply respect the impact we can have outside of the formal learning environment and dedicate much focus on initiatives such as diversity across the building and construction sector, supporting disengaged youth towards employment opportunities, men’s mental health awareness initiatives and reducing homeliness across our community.

We are as proud of our involvement in these areas as all other achievements and our genuineness in this focus, I believe, is respected and appreciated by both our fantastic staff, students and business partners.

2. You personally have also been recognised for your leadership in your organisation and across the sector with multiple awards such as the Professionals Services and Educational Executive of the Year at the CEO Awards. What lesson have you learnt about the importance of strong leadership in our sector?

In the 6 years I have been in my current role, and my previous senior executive roles, I have focussed on embedding a values-based culture that invests in student success – with enthusiastic staff, robust systems and innovative platforms.

I believe in a human-centric leadership approach and have attempted to build a culture of trust within my team, with a clear vision, and regular and open communication that drives greater empathy among employees and overall improves performance across the divisions of the business. This was particularly important during the uncertain periods that Covid-19 resulted in.

This focus flows through to the relationships we have with our students, as we ensure that we engage personally with people as individuals, utilise stories and marketing as tools for transformation, and engage actively in the macro-level conversations of our industry and the broader VET sector. This collectively shapes our delivery and development, which leads to outstanding outcomes and career pathways for a diverse range of students and staff.

I am a passionate ambassador for the VET sector and am proud to be part of a sector with such dedicated professionals who focus on helping students achieve their learning and career ambitions.

Over the previous 17 years, I have worked across public (TAFE), enterprise and independent training organisations, holding Senior Management and Executive level positions, delivering across diverse cohorts including to domestic students, onshore to international students and offshore to international students. This is a sector that I believe is integral to Australia being able to meet its current and future skilled labour requirements and maintain efficient and productive workplaces.

It is a sector that I look forward to continuing to take part in and positively impact for many years to come.

3. Could you briefly elaborate on your role and responsibilities at ITECA as well as how ITECA is assisting the RTO industry?

I have been actively involved with the Independent Tertiary Education Council Australia (ITECA) (previously the Australian Council for Private Education and Training (ACPET)) over the last 12 years, and I am pleased to have been able to play a role supporting the Peak body for independent tertiary education providers.

With ITECA, I am proud to be currently a Non-Executive Director and Board member, as well as Chair of the National VET Steering Group, Chair of the Governance Committee and Chair of the Victorian State Community. ITECA is supported by a strong executive team, highly respected Board members, and passionate VET professionals who represent strongly on State and National Committees.

With Independent tertiary education providers delivering the majority of training across Australia, ITECA plays such an important role as a strong voice representing the interests of its members, as well as the broader independent sector. This representation and the community of practice that ITECA has created has become even more important over the last 18 months where a range of providers have faced significant challenges aligned with Covid-19 restrictions.

The role of Peak Bodies such as ITECA is integral through the functions they complete including research, policy development, advice to government and sector advocacy and representation. ITECA plays an important role in championing the great outcomes being achieved by independent provides across Australia, and through research papers such as their ‘State of the Sector Report’, they help to ensure that government policy is, as much as possible, aligned with real outcomes and data rather than more ideological reasoning.

Whether it being with ITECA, other Peak Bodies or industry associations, I would recommend to all that they look to join and become active in helping to drive positive changes for our sector.

4. You are one of the very few recognised quality industry experts and leaders that we have in Australia, so how has your experience been working with the regulatory body ASQA to assist them in the transition process that they are currently undergoing?

I think that we have a range of quality representatives and consultants in Australia who add much value across the sector.

My pathway towards becoming a CEO is one that is potentially unconventional for our sector having followed a pathway from training delivery, into Training Management, into managing Resource Development and Curriculum Design, into Quality Assurance and Compliance Management and then as a VET Quality Consultant across public and independent providers.

I do remember speaking at a conference many years ago and being introduced as one of Australia’s first Compliance CEO’s which to me seemed a strange thing to be noted due to how highly regulated our sector is and the significant importance of a CEO being intrinsically involved in ensuring quality and compliance across their organisations.

I have always seen a strong focus on quality and compliance in our sector as a business enabler and to this stage of my career I believe the investment into understanding the VET landscape including all aspects of regulation and compliance has been highly beneficial in my role as CEO as well as someone who often speaks at industry events and conferences, with a focus on providing helpful guidance to others in our sector.

I believe that a short number of years ago, the disconnect between the National Regulator and the regulated community was something unhealthy for our sector and the uncertainty for RTO’s on what they could expect at audit and how to ensure their own operations where compliant with respect to each aspect of the Standards was to the detriment of our sectors reputation.

With significant changes to the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) to adapt its culture and relationship with the sector, including a move away from their previous audit model to a performance assessment framework, I think that genuine change has been occurring and across a number of areas the rubber has been genuinely hitting the road.

I was pleased to be appointed to the ASQA Stakeholder Liaison Group (SLG) and I have been impressed about ASQA’s openness to take on feedback from members of the SLG, using this feedback to update key documents including their Corporate Plan and Regulatory Model to reference areas such as the importance of education and consistency in audit activity and outcomes.

One of the significant changes that ASQA has implemented has been its launched educative function which I believe has added great value to RTO’s in understanding their obligations, as well as hearing from industry representatives on how they implement best practice in their own organisations.

I have been glad to be able to work with others to positively support ASQA’s launching of this educative function, and their initial content production, having taken part myself in 6 education sessions so far covering topics such as regulatory practice, audit expectations, online education quality and compliance expectations and trainer capability.

I look forward to further ASQA webinar sessions over the coming months where I will be presenting on teacher/trainer capability and the upcoming review of the TAE Training Package.
All involvement in these groups, working committees and conferences I speak at, I do unpaid, and volunteer my time in order to positively support the VET sector.

5. You are Chair of the Education Industry Reference Committee and the Foundation Skills Industry Reference Committee through PWC – Skills for Australia, what changes to Training Packages can we expect to see over the coming period.

I was humbled to be nominated by my peers as Chair of these IRC’s that have such high quality and respected VET sector representatives on them. I don’t take lightly the importance of getting Training Packages right for training providers, students and the industries which employ graduates, and this will be particularly the case for an upcoming new version of the Certificate IV in Training and Assessment.

The Industry Reference Committee has on three previous occasions requested to the Australian Industry and Skills Committee (AISC), that a review of the TAE Training Package take place to ensure that any disconnects with industry needs can be addressed. It has been the view of the IRC for an extended period that the Training Package does not fully address modern workforce needs including the Certificate IV’s insufficient flexibility regarding packaging rules.

Pleasingly, the AISC has now approved the review, and redevelopment can take place and the IRC is looking forward to receiving robust feedback from providers to ensure that improvements can be made.

The review itself will take part in two stages, with an initial e-learning and e-assessment development project to be completed by December in 2021, and a full review of all qualifications within the TAE Training Package to be completed by late November 2022.

One important point is that it will be the strong recommendation of the IRC, that any new version of the Certificate IV in Training and Assessment, be recognised as the successor to the current (under clause 1.14 / 1.15 in the Standards for RTO’s) so that the current workforce who hold the TAE40116 will not be required to upgrade their qualifications.

I have already delivered a number of webinars on these topics and for those who wish to take part in helping with the review and redevelopment I would encourage to go to the PWC – Skills for Australia website and sign up for their newsletter which will provide information on upcoming sessions and working groups. Readers are also welcome to follow me on Linkedin where I will be sharing updates on the project.

6. What are your opinions on all of the changes that will occur in the VET sector in the near future, including the new regulatory framework, the new TAE certificate, the new AQF framework, the cessation of ISCs and SSOs, the redesign of units of competency, and everything else that will occur?

In 2020, the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) released a research paper identifying that the VET workforce includes some 246,000 representatives with another 177,000 who work in volunteer roles. I think the significance of our sector, and its importance in helping Australia meet its current and future labour needs can’t be understated.

There are a number of VET Quality Reforms underway at present, with a focus on ensuring that our sector is fit for purpose and is regulated and supported in a way that will help achieve the outcomes required.

In addition to a current review of the Standards for Registered Training Organisations that is underway, earlier this year, Skills Ministers agreed to establish new industry-based clusters (Industry Clusters) with broad roles and responsibilities for skills and workforce development by December 2022. Industry Clusters will replace Industry Reference Committees (IRCs), Skills Service Organisations (SSOs) and Skills Organisation Pilots (SOs).

The establishment of Industry Clusters is intended to enhance the role of industry in the national training system with a broader role and greater accountability to industry.

I am part of a number of consultations on this review activity through the different hats that I wear, and in each I do raise my concerns regarding the potential to not intrinsically involve Registered Training Organization’s as part of the process of Training Package design and implementation. I think to not do so, is not only disrespectful to a sector that employs or engages a workforce of over 400,000, but would also be counter-intuitive to achieving positive outcomes that draw on the knowledge from strong relationships that RTO’s have with the industries they help serve with graduates.

With the approved review of the TAE Training Package now underway, I was pleased that aligning with this a TAE Strategic Advisory Committee has been established with myself being an invited member. This Committee will act as a sounding board for the Education IRC throughout the TAE Training Package re-development project, with the key goal of ensuring appropriate linkages between the review and broader VET workforce policy and regulatory directions and settings.

This will allow for input on topics such as clauses 1.17 to 1.20 within the Standards for RTO’s to ensure that the Standards continue to allow for the provision of supervision of trainers where needed, even where the standards and training package may be updated, with an additional skill set that may be agreed to be recognised under this clause being developed.

7. I clearly remember that we first spoke in 2010 when you were the CEO of a different training organisation and I was a Director of Studies somewhere else; what do you believe has changed in the VET sector in the last 10-11 years and what do you believe we will see over the coming years?

I have enjoyed seeing your journey as a highly respected VET sector representative, and it does feel like a long time since then.

It is important to remember the significant role our sector plays in supporting Australian workforces with our VET sector made up of over 3500 registered training organisations (RTOs) delivering nationally recognised VET, and a number more delivering micro-credentials and non-accredited training. In 2020, 3.9 million students were enrolled in nationally recognised vocational education and training (VET) despite challenges faced over the period including a significant reduction in international students.

Increased and inconsistent regulatory activity; reduced and/or inconsistent State and Federal investment into the sector; changes to visa and related conditions for international students; and delivery impacts caused by Covid-19 restrictions have all challenged providers in their continued support of student learning outcomes and this has seen a significant reduction in training provider numbers over the last decade.

I think that our sector has also taken a number of years to recover from the reputational damage caused by a small number of unscrupulous providers related to the use of VET-FEE Help who took advantaged or a poorly structured and regulated scheme.

Despite this, the very large majority of training providers of all types, continue their focus on student centric, high quality delivery and student and employer satisfaction rates continue to show that largely positive outcomes continue to be achieved throughout the sector.

I think what we will see over the coming years is a much greater focus on collaboration, and organisations either working as part of a consortium or as a minimum as part of a strong community of practice. This will support the sharing of ideas, and quality practices across organisations, and make benchmarking easier for the betterment of all. Consultants also play an important role in conducting reviews across an RTO’s operations and giving insight into best practice and innovation they have seen in other areas of the sector.

I think that the importance of RTO’s being part of their Peak Bodies, or other quality and practitioner networks will continue to increase, and, in a post Covid-19 environment, the importance of the VET sector will be more so than ever. This will include the return of international students with Australia able to continue to build on its strong reputation in supporting students who wish to study both onshore and offshore.

Despite the challenges that Covid-19 created in limiting face to face delivery for periods, the online learning workforce capability this fast-tracked will be of great benefit to providers and the sector moving forward. From a recent paper released by ASQA, survey data from over 3000 participants at a webinar series that I was part of regarding online learning, showed that over 90 per cent had started or increased delivery via an online mode over the last 18 months. Although online learning is not suited to all student cohorts, or all qualifications, and rarely can it meet the needs of delivering full qualifications, this capability will better aid the sector in meeting student needs and expectations moving forward.


For those who wish to connect with or follow Andrew Shea, you can do so via his Linkedin, here – www.linkedin.com/in/andrewjshea

Interview – Matthew Dale – Director, Audit Express and Educonomy


With more than a decade experience working across the VET Sector, Matthew brings a wealth of skills, knowledge and experience to Audit Express & Educonomy. Matthew has had extensive experience in managing the quality & compliance of various state funding contracts and in leading RTOs through the complex process of re-registration. Matthew’s passion is with ensuring that training organisations can adapt to change and ensure the continuing quality of training while also ensuring compliance with the relevant contracts and standards.


Sukh Sandhu: What are the primary challenges and core issues of operating in the VET sector?

Matthew Dale: The VET sector is currently at a real crossroad and is facing numerous challenges and issues. The key challenges being faced by most RTOs is the volume and pace of changes to training packages, which is providing to costly and time consuming for RTOs to adapt to. The relevance and responsiveness of training packages to the needs of industry is also posing a real issue, this is particularly the case as we enter into the post-covid economic recovery. Many industries and sectors are unable to commit to enrolling their workforce into full qualifications to meet the training needs of their organisations, and many are shifting away from traditional accredited training solutions, opting for more innovative and agile non-accredited training solutions, including micro-credentials. For more information on micro-credentials, be sure to check out the educonomy micro-credential and digital badging virtual summit.

Sukh Sandhu: You are one of the very few quality RTO and VET consultants with extensive vocational education and training sector knowledge and skills, according to you, what are the five skills that a significant number of consultants in the VET sector lack and what RTO clients should be careful about?

Matthew Dale: That’s a big call and is very kind of you to say. In my experience, the RTO and VET consultants that I have encountered, each have their area of specialist knowledge and expertise. I’m not sure that I could narrow it down to five skills that RTO clients should be careful about, rather what I would note is that consultants should be clear on what their area of expertise is, and they should work to their strengths, rather than seeking to be a ‘jack of all trades, and master of none’, that they work to their strengths and that RTO clients are really clear when engaging the services of a consultant, that they are really clear on the scope of work they are wanting to be completed and that they recruit suitably qualified and experienced consultants accordingly. It is also a really good idea to always seek professional references before making the decision to engage a consultant.

Sukh Sandhu: You’re involved in a variety of activities in the online and training education space; so perhaps you could discuss a few of them for our subscribers?

Matthew Dale: For a number of years now, we have been supporting our clients to shift their traditional classroom and workplace-based training programs to blended and online delivery modes, which are supported by engaging online content. In 2018 we expanded our work in this space with the launch of Educonomy, a consultancy firm with a big vision of positioning Australia as a global EdTech leader by transforming the current economy of learning and ensuring that every learner is recognised for their skills, regardless of how or where learning takes place. Our team have spent the past 5 years researching global trends in education. We have observed a pattern and trends across the globe as institutions step away from traditional education systems & opt for newer, more innovative options for learning, including micro-learning & micro-credentials. At Educonomy, we drive the future of education by transforming the way we learn. Combining strategy, latest EdTech and expertise, we help education providers to shift into the future and meet the needs of tomorrow. For more information on creating engaging learning content, be sure to check out the educonomy digital learning virtual summit.

Sukh Sandhu: What, in your opinion, are the key distinctions between a quality training provider and a poor quality training provider?

Matthew Dale: Put simply, the key distinctions that set aside quality training providers from the rest are a genuine commitment to the following points:

  • Learner experience
  • Learner support
  • Maintaining a strong connection and links to industry
  • Establishing and maintaining strong governance processes and quality controls, that drive the quality of learning and assessment content
  • Continuously reviewing the products offered, seeking genuine feedback and input from learners, trainers, assessors, management and external stakeholders, including employers

Sukh Sandhu: What, in your opinion, is effective or ineffective in the current regulatory environment?

Matthew Dale: The VET regulators (ASQA, VRQA & TAC) seem to have turned a new page and all seem to be taking a more reasonable and consultative approach to the way in which they have regulated over the past five years, which is great! I tend to look on the positive side and do what I can to effect change where I can, rather than focussing on that which is outside of my control.

Sukh Sandhu: What message would you like to send to training providers who operate in a regulated environment?

Matthew Dale: Focus on what you are good at, know your niche and stick to it. Commit to improving the quality of your learning content and user experience in the areas that you specialise in, and stick to that. Rather than trying to be everything to everyone, just focus on the areas that you want to succeed in and focus on being the best in the market in that! 2022 is the year for refocussing and consolidation, make it a year worth remembering.


Matthew Dale can be contacted through the LinkedIn profile. https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-dale

 

Interview with Anurag Kanwar – BEc, LLB, LLM, GDLP, AAPRI, FIML, MAICD.


Anurag has over 15 years of experience in higher education all within the private higher education space. She is the executive secretary of the GCA Board of Directors. She is a prolific commentator on LinkedIn with over 6000 followers commenting on international education, technology and continuous experience.

She is a practising lawyer specialising in the area of corporate governance and risk. She is also an experienced lecturer and publishes in the area of international education and business law. She is a board member of the Australian Risk Management Institute, and a member of their Education Committee of the Australian Risk Management Institute. She is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Managers and Leaders, an Associate of the Australian Risk Management Institute and an Associate Director of the Project Management Institute Sydney Chapter.

She is also a member of Law Ninjas online networking group for in-house lawyers and the former deputy convener of the admissions and compliance working group of IEAA. Outside of the international education and law space, Anurag is a member of the Career Progress Network Sydney Chapter a group dedicated to helping young people and immigrants gaining employment.

Anurag is currently the Compliance and Continuous Improvement Director at Group Colleges Australia.


Sukh Sandhu: As a supporter and promoter of vocational education and training in Australia, what roles have you played?

Anurag Kanwar: I worked for a number of dual sector providers, and in private practice, I assisted RTOs in meeting their compliance obligations through internal audits and performing audit rectification work.

Sukh Sandhu: What are your thoughts on the ways ASQA is currently changing its regulatory and legislative practices?

Anurag Kanwar: I don’t work in VET anymore but from my reading, ASQA is now moving towards more self-assurance for institutions with a greater emphasis on evidence.

Sukh Sandhu: Why has working in the vocational education and training sector been rewarding?

Anurag Kanwar: The sector is dynamic and has the means to change people’s lives.

Sukh Sandhu: Why is working in the VET sector challenging?

Anurag Kanwar: Changes to the regulatory environment. There was a time when there were changes every 2 weeks. This then creates a high cost of compliance.

There are also a number of consultants in the sector who are not legally trained which also can be problematic. There is also sometimes a mismatch between the various pieces of legislation. For example, a number of providers found themselves in breach of the ESOS Act because they were delivering short courses such as responsible service of alcohol to international students. The providers were not CRICOS registered.

Sukh Sandhu: What do you believe are the primary threats to the Australian VET system?

Anurag Kanwar: The pandemic with its challenges and the high cost of regulatory compliance.

Sukh Sandhu: What do you wish someone had told you when you first started out in this position?

Anurag Kanwar: A sense of humour is a must. Another tip is to understand risk and what mitigation strategies can be used.

Sukh Sandhu: What would you like to communicate to training providers operating within the regulated environment?

Anurag Kanwar:

– Sign up for ASQA and TEQSA alerts
– Twitter is a good source of information from government agencies.
– Connect with other industry people. We can all share from each other.


Anurag Kanwar can be contacted through the LinkedIn profile. https://www.linkedin.com/in/anurag-k

Validation Demystified – Part I

Validation is arguably the central pillar of the VET practice and has a valued place in the education system. It is one of the few compliance requirements that influence and is accountable for more than a dozen standards within the Standards for RTO 2015. As such, validation is the much-studied, crammed and piloted concept of educational practice in Australia and globally.

Yet, there is much misunderstanding, interchangeability of meaning and objective with other concepts and inconsistency of interpretation and practice of validation. Most often than not, there is confusion in the understanding of Pre-validation (now termed by ASQA as Verification), Moderation, and Validation. 

The confusion goes beyond the terminologies. There is a wide range of inconsistency in the implementation of the requirements of the Standards for RTO 2015, figuring out the objectives of validation, choosing the methods of its best practice, prioritising its role in the governance and continuous improvement etc. Despite the big appetite of RTOs to appreciate and use it, validation remains the most bewildering standard of SRTO 2015.

This article will try to clarify the misperceptions and debunk the myths and mysteries

Why does validation remain challenging to understand and implemented inconsistently across RTO practice? The puzzling questions include:

  • What are the areas that RTOs misunderstand?
  • What are the frequent mistakes made by practitioners?
  • Which part is found non-compliant during audits?
  • What are the darkest areas of validation that are leading to obscurity and process inefficiency?
  • What is blurring is the distinction between validation, moderation and pre-validation, and why do they become intertwined in current practice.
  • What does independent validator mean, independent from what is considered as independent? Why only in 1.25 and not in 1.9 – 1.11.
  • Why is moderation not mandatory but essential?

Problem 1. The problem starts in the foundation of the concept of validation, its definition and denotation.

Many RTOs use Moderation, Pre validation and Validation interchangeably. The Standards for RTO 2015 mention validation in different sections with different requirements which sometimes invokes different connotations to different people. Due to this and other reasons some people find it difficult to understand what standards are relevant to which part of the Validation, Pre-Validation or Moderation.

Many RTOs have the impression that Pre-validation and Moderation are not as important as Validation and think they do not have intra-relation as they are very different from each other.

Let’s start with the basic definitions.

Pre-Validation (Verification) is the practice of validation that occurs before using the assessment tools. This validation happens after either developing the assessment tool or purchasing it from providers, and you want to validate them. The objective of pre-validation (Verification) is to ensure that the devices meet the requirements of the training package and ensure they are a valid tool that ascertains the assessment will be conducted according to the principles of assessment and rules of evidence. Whether you develop your own tool or purchase them from providers, RTOs are required to verify they are fit for purpose and valid assessments.

Validation is the quality review of the assessment process and is generally conducted after the assessment is complete. Validation involves checking that your assessment tools have produced valid, reliable, sufficient, current and authentic evidence, enabling your RTO to make reasonable judgements about whether training package (or VET accredited course) requirements have been met.

Moderation is a quality control process aimed at bringing assessment judgements into alignment. Moderation is generally conducted before the finalisation of student results as it ensures the same decisions are applied to all assessment results within the same unit of competency.

How are they aligned to SRTO 2015, and what are their commonalities?

The standards that affect each concept are different. The below table will give you a clear understanding of the representation of standards per each concept.

 

Concept Objectives When takes place Relevant Standards
Pre-Validation (verification) Ensure they are a valid tool that ascertains the assessment will be conducted according to the principles of assessment and rule of evidence Prior to using the tools. 1.5, 1.6, 1.8
Moderation Bringing assessment judgements into alignment Before the finalisation of student results 1.8 and 3.1
Validation A quality review process that confirms your RTO’s assessment system can consistently produce valid assessment judgements. After the assessment tool is implemented and student assessments are completed and marked. 1.5, 1.6, 2.2, 3.1, 1.13, 1.1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, and 1.25

Though their definition and purpose are diverse, Pre validation, Moderation, and Validation have one shared goal. They are destined to ensure the best practice of effective assessment, mainly assessment practice and judgment.

Problem 2. The ‘two units 50% in three years and five years cycle’ syndrome and compliance mentality.

Many RTOs believe that the validation must be conducted at 50%, and this is done because of compliance requirements. For this reason, the RTOs wait until the last day and are not able to identify the problem at an early stage. These results in finding themselves in the unfortunate position of non-compliance with standard 3.1. They have to revoke the certificates and redo all assessments again because they have awarded certification documentation to learners whom they have NOT assessed as meeting the training product requirements specified in the relevant training package.

RTOs must see the Standards as a document that describe what outcomes an RTO must achieve, not how they must be achieved (policed).

‘50% three years and five years cycle’ is the minimum but risky requirement.

Scheduling and adhering to 50% of qualifications in three years is equivalent to planning for failure and non-compliance. The best time to validate your resources is today, not tomorrow.

RTOs need to develop a validation schedule the day they receive their registration to validate each training product (AQF qualification, skill set, unit of competency, accredited short course and module) on its scope of registration. The validation clock starts to tick from that day, and the quality requirements increase with each clock tick.

Problem 3. Many RTOs believe they have conducted their validation; however, they are deemed to be non-compliant with Standards 1.10 – 1.11 and 1.25.

Several RTOs do the validation but are not followed by any rectification plan, and that makes their validation part of a problem instead of part of a solution.

Many RTOs opt to cut corners—by developing a generic validation tool strategy from a template and asking validators to ‘sign off’, which most often than not, results in a yes ticks and flicks.

Some RTOs also conduct the validation by one person, usually a compliance officer/manager, without considering the requirements of the validation team. Many RTOs make mistakes in sampling and choosing their assessment to be validated. Because they use a sample of their best students or trainers who have been deemed competent, their validation produces a bad validation outcome.

For many RTOs, the main reason can be described as “validation conducted for the sake of conducting’ not for an effective outcome and meaning full action. The absence of systemic, documented process and assessment tools and guides is customary in many RTOs.

Most RTOs have validation policies and procedures. However, the method does not articulate and demonstrate in detail what they must do, how they will do it, when they will do it, who is responsible for doing what, the mechanism for monitoring them, and the evidence they can provide.

RTOs must develop and implement a system with evidence (that can be seen, touched and heard) to ensure assessment judgements are consistently made on a sound basis and validation of assessment judgements is carried out regularly.

Next is the validation tools, far from a ‘sign me up’ checklist with close-ended yes and no answers that lead validators to say yes. For example, asking validators to tick ‘the principles of assessments are good’ will not be effective and does not demonstrate that the assessment practice and judgment was informed by validators.

Though there is no specific method or approach that you must follow, you must demonstrate that:

  • You have developed a schedule to validate each training product (AQF qualification, skill set, unit of competency, accredited short course and module) on your scope.
  • You adjusted the validation schedule when adding a new training product. When making adjustments, ensure your plan continues to meet the timeframe and completion requirements discussed above.
  • The training products must be validated as per the schedule; putting a validation schedule without implementing it is worse than not having a plan.
  • Select your validators and ensure at least one subject matter expert ‘industry relevance’ requirements.
  • The assessment tool must contain an open-ended and meaningful questions that can check the assessment practice and judgment from different angles

The ‘two units from qualification’ pattern.

Part of the validation failure is when RTOs stick into the ‘two units per qualification’ approach. The number of units and the selection criteria must not insist on the minimum requirement as one size does not fit all.

Statistically, valid sampling is essential in the process of validation.

A statistically valid sample is:

· large enough that the validation outcomes of the model can be applied to the entire set of judgements, and
· taken randomly from the collection of assessment judgements being considered.

Calculating sample size

You must validate enough assessments to ensure that the results of your validation are accurate and are representative of the total completed assessments for the training product.
To determine appropriate sample sizes, you can use ASQA’s validation sample size calculator.

Whatever model or method you use, you must ensure your sampling will provide you with a very low error level and high confidence in assessment practices and judgements.

Random selection

Many RTOs use the sample of their best students or trainers who have been deemed competent, which produces a lousy validation outcome.

Randomly selecting your sample will ensure adequate coverage of varying levels of learner performance. You may also supplement the random selection by adding additional completed assessments (for example, to include both competent and not competent assessments, or to include multiple assessors’ decisions, various delivery modes and locations) to ensure the validation process is representative of all assessment judgements.

(Reference, ASQA and NCVER)

Message from the CEO (4 October 2021)

Message from the CEO


Our professional development event related to Skills First Funding was a huge success, with hundreds of people in attendance. We have made the video available online on our websites so that you can check out the material.

We are a team of quality and compliance experts who have been in the business for decades. We have been answering your questions since the early 2000’s and we thank you for sticking with us.
This month we are launching our “Your questions and our answers series”, a free webinar series that will occur on Friday the 29th of October between 12 to 1 PM. If you have questions do not hesitate to send them to us and we will try to answer them during the live sessions.

You can read more information in the “Your questions and our answers series” article. Join us for an hour of free compliance education! All attendees will receive certificates of attendance from us.
As always, if you require assistance in any way, please contact us via email at info@caqa.com.au.

Sukh Sandhu
CEO

Australia’s five most powerful education leaders in 2021

AFR Magazine’s annual Power issue, out on Friday, October 1, includes lists of the key players across six industry sectors. Here the people topping teaching in a profound year for the sector.

Remote learning has been gathering momentum for decades, but it was the initial shock of the pandemic that made it mainstream. Although the impact of COVID-19 on the education sector has been profound, the movement, en masse, to online learning across schools, colleges and universities might be its most enduring legacy.

Alongside the pivot in teaching, the most painful shock for universities has been the almost overnight halt in the flow of international students who contributed $40 billion to the economy in 2019. Universities have been accused of becoming addicted to these rivers of gold, using the money to prop up investments in research and new buildings.

For more information, please visit here.

New job opportunities!

JOIN THE RECRUITMENT REVOLUTION
Operations Manager (Mullumbimby, NSW)
Sales Representative (Surry Hills, NSW)
Compliance Manager (Wollongong, NSW)
RTO Senior Office Administrator (Morayfield, QLD)
Barber Trainers (Chermside, Brisbane West, Ipswich, Toowoomba)
CHC Trainers (Melbourne, VIC)
BSB Trainers (Melbourne, VIC)
FNS Trainers (Melbourne, VIC)
ICT Trainers (Melbourne, VIC)
Looking for a new opportunity?
Whether you are a jobseeker, seeking additional hours, or not satisfied with your current job, you can find a new opportunity that suits your skills and experience through CAQA Recruitment. New vacancies are posted regularly. The process is simple! Register with us, upload your resume and begin your search.You decide how much or how little information you want to display. So what are you waiting for? Register today and let employers find you.

For more information:

Are you looking for staff?
At CAQA Recruitment we help employers find the best talent for their organisation. We understand that hiring is a complex and sometimes costly process. However, it can be simplified and made easy on a budget by opting for our services. Our recruitment platform receives a huge number of interest from applicants who are seeking new opportunities in the VET sector.

Best of all your first ad is FREE.

For more information:

Our webinar related to Skills First – By CAQA Experts


Sukh Sandhu – Hello and welcome everyone. Please accept our thoughts and prayers for all those who are affected by the lockdown across Australia before we commence today’s presentation.

The last several months have been extremely demanding and exhausting, but we are hoping that we will be able to come out of this situation eventually. We respectfully acknowledge the Wurundjeri, people of the Kulin nation who are the traditional owners of the land on which we are located and pay our respects to their elders past, present and emerging. We are honoured to recognize our connection to Wurundjeri country, history, cultures, spirituality through these locations and strive to ensure that we operate in a manner that respects and honours the elders and ancestors of these lands.

Please keep in mind that this webinar is not sponsored or affiliated with the department of education and training. We are doing this webinar exclusively for informational purposes only.

Because we have been receiving hundreds of messages and emails that we were thinking basically that if we start responding to those, that will take us a lot of time. So we decided to provide a professional development event to assist you with all of those questions and inquiries. As RTO owners and consultants, we understand how difficult it can be to comprehend and find information if you are new to the funding training space and regulatory requirements. And that is the area where we can assist you.

We would also like to point out that as useful for what professional development sessions, a substantial amount of information will be included. We usually offer professional development sessions to people who have a retainer agreements service with us, or those interested in conducting internal audits.

The information presented will be relevant to us, our organization, our services, as well as the topic we are presenting to you.

My name is Sukh Sandhu, and many of you are familiar with me from my work in the compliance and quality industry, audit, regulatory, risk management, and corporate governance fields. I am an ISO 9001 lead auditor, have been working in the education and training industry for the last 25 years, have worked as national compliance and quality assurance manager with the Australian Catholic University, chief operating officer and chief executive officer for a number of training providers. I have also worked with the Australian Skills Quality Authority as their business systems project official back in 2011, 2012. My qualifications include two MBAs, three masters in IT and systems, a Graduate diploma of management learning, Diploma in training design and development, Diploma in vocational education training, Diploma of work, health and safety, Diploma of Quality Auditing, Advanced diploma of management, Advanced diploma in marketing, human resources, information technology, and a number of other courses and qualifications. I have been working as a lecturer and as a trainer and assessor since 1998, I’ve been a vocal advocate of audit reforms and system centred auditing practices rather than auditor centred auditing practices for many years.

And today I’m joined by my colleague Stuart Newman, who is our National Business Development Manager. Stuart has been working with us not only for established brands but also to help other brands and organizations generate new business.

So let’s take a look at the primary reason why we are all here today. The department of education and training Victoria has notified the industry skills first contracting arrangements for 2022. The subject of our discussion today is the same. Limited expression of interest skills, first training for specific programs.

Several questions were submitted prior to this event, and you are also invited to submit additional questions through the comments section during this session as well. Given that we only have an hour here, we will try our level best to cover as many questions as we can in that timeframe. If we are unable to answer those questions during this session, we will do our best to address them after the session concludes. The department of education and training sent out the contract notification that they basically called CN to all funded training organizations on August 10th, 2021, informing them of the terms of the agreement, skills First VET Funding Contracts for the year 2021 are set to expire on the 31st of December, 2021, according to this contract notification. Skills first VET funding contracts for 2022 will be available through the department for the one year period. The department has adopted a one year contract in order to account for the changing and dynamic nature of the vocational education and training sector. Reforms are still in the way at both the state and national levels, and they are trying to keep the second contract stable until 2022, while these reforms are being established and enforced. The department of education and training expressed their confidence in the quality and performance of the existing contractor training providers, as well as they have demonstrated capacity to offer skills First training courses.

So if you are, or anyone already has an existing 2021 contract, you will be offered a 2022 contract without having to go through the whole expression of interest process again. Contract offers for 2022 will be subject to the department of education and training, being satisfied with the results of an independent financial review assessment conducted on your RTO’s operations and business operations.

To be eligible to participate in this process, you will be needed to submit information about your company’s corporate structure as well as your most recent audited financial statements, my apologies, for the most recent financial year reporting period. These financial statements must be audited by an auditor who is registered with the Australian securities and investments commission, we call ASIC. These documents will need to be presented to departments independent financial assessors by the middle of October this year.

Learn local organisations, if you are one of them, will be required to provide audited financial accounts, but they are not required to have their financial statements to be audited by an ASIC qualified auditor as is the case currently. You don’t have to provide audited financial statements at all if you are one of the TAFE Institute, dual-sector university, Victorian government senior secondary provider, or the legal entity that is a Victorian government department, or other Victorian government or entity, including those owned by the local councils in Victoria. Before we proceed to the next segment, we would like to inform you that this video is being recorded and will be available on our main website at www.caqa.com.au. You can access at any time you like to listen to it again.

Slide two.

In this webinar, we will walk you through a number of important areas of the funded contract. We will also discuss our organisation compliance and quality assurance and career calling international. Then we will move to information related to what is skill first, how it work, the expression of interest process, unpacking the contract, what does entering into contract entails, what the capacity and capability indicate, main evaluation criteria, approval and disapproval process, and a quick summary section. Let’s move to slide three. So with a 30 year-old dream and a 12 years practical order of operations, we have built an organization with 35 excellent consultants, thousands of compliant audit outcomes, more than 25,000 training and assessment resources, and more than 100,000 professional development webinars, sessions events to our credit. We already have a brand in which you can place your trust. For the simple reason that we couldn’t find any compliant learning and assessment tools on the market when we first started looking, my colleagues and I decided to start career calling. Despite the fact that there were resources available, none of them was of the quality we wish to deliver to our students. So our resources have been tried and proven, and they are audit ready as a result of our industry experiences. Additionally, we provide audit and regulatory compliance support, as well as advocacy and support for industry best practices. Other organisations are distinguished from other organizations for a variety of reasons. Almost everyone who works in this organization has known each other for at least 10, 15 years. They are all industry leaders who are highly qualified and forward thinkers who have a can-do attitude and who work together as a team in order to accomplish their goals. Because almost all of our team members have come from education and training backgrounds, they have comprehensive knowledge of adult learning principles, theories, and standards, as well as compliance and regulatory background. They also have extensive knowledge of compliance and regulatory frameworks and requirements. Of our organization also spent a significant amount of money on research activities, better technologies, and recruitment of exceptional people. Any organization is as good as the people that are part of it.

Therefore we have always placed a strong emphasis on finding out individuals who have a positive attitude and it can-do mentality. So there are a lot of things basically that we do through CAQA and career calling brands over subsidiaries, EDU learning, my apologies, and CAQA skills provide professional development sessions, events, webinars, CAQA recruitment and Career Calling Jobs provide recruitment services. Our sister companies CAQA digital and online video solutions provide website related services, digital, SCORM compliant files, mobile learning, and e-learning solutions. And our CAQA systems department provides information technology, cybersecurity, networking, and system support for your organization of various sizes. We have a number of other businesses as well. So I’m not mentioning those at the moment, but you can find more information on career calling websites or CAQA websites. Through CAQA we offer the following services, training and assessment resources, internal audit services and health checks, course accreditation business analysis, course products and e-learning, RTO financial viability advice and support, validation and moderation services, due diligence services, website design, recruitment services, professional development services, state and federal level funding consultancy services. You can visit our website for more information. Please also do not forget to follow us on social media including Twitter.

Some of our Twitter handles are mentioned on this slide. Let’s move to slide number four. We were receiving as we discussed a large number of questions about the contract. So we decided to organize the webinars to address them all at once. As a result, a lot of your questions will be answered through the information presented on the slides. Our primary goal is to provide you with all the knowledge and skills you require in order to operate a legally compliant training organization so that the department of education and training and other regulatory bodies can come and audit you anytime and have confidence that you are doing the things according to the requirements mentioned in the specified contract and regulatory frameworks.

Only training providers who meet rigorous eligibility and assessment requirements are eligible to deliver subsidized training under the skills first contract. In a limited expression of interest process that was launched on Tuesday, August 10th, 2021.

Training providers who can deliver specific courses to fulfill government priorities, as well as the Victoria’s skills and job demands will only be considered according to this Skills First 2022 contract. For training providers to ensure that their application is comprehensive and filled on time, filled and filed on time, it is critical that they become familiar with all the documents and supporting resources.

Consultants such as us, who have extensive experience in training and compliance, can assist you in gaining an awareness of regulatory and compliance standards and expectations of Australian government departments, both at state and federal levels.

My colleague Stuart would like to add more information to the section now. Stuart , over to you.


Stuart Newman – So thank you Sukh and good morning and thank you for coming. As you know The Department has opened a limited expression of interest for new training providers like you. That word limited indicates that there are compliance and regulatory requirements also known as rules of call of expression of interest. that you must know before embarking on this initiative. As Sukh has said at Compliance and Quality Assurance (CAQA), we want to help our clients understand these requirements so that you can make an informed decision. We also strongly advise that you read all significant documents, including the vet funding contract, the guidelines about eligibility, the guidelines about fees and the quantity charter so that when you embark in this expression of interest, you will have all the required information.


Sukh Sandhu – So the next slide is what is Skills First? Skills First is a set of reforms for the private training and TAFE system. That reform ensures that Victoria’s training and TAFE system delivers high quality training that leads learners to real jobs. Skills First is made up of high-quality training that students and industry can trust, aligned to industry and workforce needs, a real voice for industry in training, and funding for high needs learners who need additional support to engage with and succeed in education and training, and access to targeted relevant training for students in regional areas. My colleague Stuart would like to add more information to this section now. Stuart over to you again.


Stuart Newman – Yeah. Thank you Sukh. So let’s start with the basic question. What is Skill First? Because that will be a good foundation to the next slides. So Skill First is a Victorian government program for funding individual entitlements. In this context, entitlement means the right to the government subsidised place in training for persons who are eligible in accordance with the criteria set in the contract. Understanding the concept of eligibility is very important because most providers are found non compliant with the eligibility criteria and requirements set out in Clause 2 of the contract during audits. So just for clarification as we continue, just for a clarification the Contract means the 2022 Standard VET Funding Contract Skills First Program and the Department means the Department of Education and Training.


Sukh Sandhu – Slide six, what is the expression of interest about? An expression of interest provides you with the opportunity to represent yourself in a clear and professional manner to the department. It is an opportunity to provide present critical information and to demonstrate your organization is suitable, interested, and available in respect to the funding contract being considered. Now, my colleague Stuart will add more information in this section.


Stuart Newman – Yeah. So to see the EOI, it may be better to analyze it from the perspective of the approaching that gives you. So the EOI is a process by which you demonstrate your desire to deliver nationally recognised vocational training. It’s also a process by which adhere to the requirements and obligations set out in the Contract of the Skills First Program, but more importantly, and please note this, more importantly EOI is a process by which you will confirm your capacity and capability. Capacity and capability will mean your ability to demonstrate you have a track record of delivering quality training and assessment, and that you are ready to meet all the requirements such as compliance expectations and Framework. And we want you to note that the contract has a strict legislation and obligation that you must demonstrate if successful in this application.


Sukh Sandhu – What does entering into a contract entail? Any contract regardless of whether it is with a private or public organization, will always have terms and conditions that must be followed in order for each to be valid. The contract is legally enforceable and provides rights and obligations that exist between or among the parties to the agreement. Now my colleague Stuart will provide additional information on this subject, and Stuart will also explain some of the information contained in that following few slides as well. Stuart to you.


Stuart Newman – Yeah, thank you Sukh. So as Sukh said the VET Funding is a Contract BETWEEN The State of Victoria through the Secretary of the Department of Education and Training AND you as a provider.

So by applying for and accepting the contract, you are agreeing to be bound by the terms of the funding contract. This includes your agreement that you have carried out all relevant investigations and readings to acquaint yourself with your contractual obligations.

And one of these documents is the quality charter. This charter will help you understand how the department expects you to deliver key aspects of Training Services in the Contract. As you can see from the slide, the six principles of this quality charter are the guide to ensure strong, stable, and high quality training. The accountability and governance in Principle 2 aims to ensure the proper use of the position of trust placed in the expenditure of public money because this is taxpayers’ money. So the department wants accountability in governance in this contract.

There are a lot of people who are asking us if there is an audit in the skill first program? And the short answer is yes. The department may conduct an audit at any time to confirm you are complying with the contract and they want to establish

  • whether and to what extent the funds has been used in respect of the skill contract And
  • to investigate allegations or suspicions of misuse of the funds, and
  • to determine the extent to which the training services are of high quality.

But, there is also a requirement of internal audit. Also you will be required to conduct and submit an internal audit within six months after the Commencement Date. The internal audit and the rectification must be signed by the CEO. And anytime the department may ask you to submit this internal audit report, including the rectification that you have taken according to the internal audit.


Sukh Sandhu – I would also like to add something Stuart to the previous slide as well. So the skills first application that provides all the RTOs an opportunity, eligible RTOs, my apologies, an opportunity to provide high-quality training to Victorian students in order to close the skill gap. It is not a business opportunity that is unconcerned about the students or the quality of education and training. The Australian government at federal level and Victorian government are committed to ensuring that every dollar spent on funding is spent wisely as much as audits may occur at anytime as Stuart said to ensure that all is well at your end, and that you are aware of your responsibilities, obligations, and regulations under which you operate and contracted.


Stuart Newman – Yeah. Thank you, Sukh. So what will you need to demonstrate in this EOI? So let’s start with the do’s. The do’s are, you must have delivered training in one or more programs of 2022 released office specific programs that you can find in our website, and you have to make sure that you have delivered to a minimum of 20 students in 2020, and a minimum of 10 students in 2021 calendar year.

The other do’s is you must complete all documents and sign on the declarations. Your financial assessment must pass the probability of default assessment to be undertaken by independent corporate that is assigned by the department.

Let’s now go to the don’ts. So since January, 2011, which is in the last 10 years, you must not, you must not have had a Victorian funding contract or service agreement terminated by the department on the basis of your performance. And another don’t is you must not have contracting or otherwise dealing with any disallowed person. In the questions and answer section we will elaborate what does disallowed person means

In area of the evaluation criteria, one of the main factors is your financial assessment task As Sukh has elaborated you must pass the Probability of Default Assessment to be undertaken by an independent contractor. And point two is your Training and Assessment delivery and business practice need to have a quality track record and satisfactory Compliance and Quality history. And number three in the evaluation criteria is, you must have a sound program to deliver plans, PDP, which we’ll elaborate on in the next slide.

In evaluating this criterion, the Department will exercise its own discretion and due diligence including a review of your data, submitted to the NCVER against measures associated with deliberate and typical course durations.

So what are the program delivery plans? This is one of the main pillars in your submission. The program delivery plan is your anticipated training delivery plan that reflects the nature and quantity. So it’s not only the quality, but also the quantity of the training you plan to deliver. In this context, the amount of training is important. So the department will use this information to review your forecasted training.

A sound PDP is one which strongly demonstrates the alignment of the anticipated delivery with the objectives in the SVTS. Alignment is here the key word, that means it will play a great role in your PDP, or your program delivery plan. You are strongly encouraged to consider the anticipated delivery with reference to the government’s objectives, and you have to align your PDP to supply with employment demand. So the jobs and training needs report are important references for you to understand how to align your PDP with the employment demand.

How do you know the employment demand?

You have to see the job and training needs report that you can find in SVTS portal.


Sukh Sandhu – I’ll add something to PDP. So PDP, for the organisations that have ever been contacted by the department of education and training, they know that this has been going on for the last several years. And training providers submit this program, delivery plans, PDPs, to the department in order to offer critical information as Stuart explained, that supports in further developing the Victorian training system including the type of training to be provided and how it will be delivered. So the PDPs serve as a foundation for the department’s contract and qualification allocations, as well as deal with previous history. So Stuart now you can explain the next one. How do you demonstrate that your PDP is aligned with government job outlooks?


Stuart Newman – Yeah, so how do you ensure the alignment of your PDP with the job outlook? As we said, alignment is the key to your application. So in the submission portal in the SVTS, there is a section of PDP objectives. These objectives are three, one is related to delivering quality, the second one is it’s alignment to the growing employment, and the third is how do you promote equity and address disadvantages. So your PDP must answer these three questions adequately. For example, in number one, delivering quality, you can articulate how your training policy supports your students to be well equipped for employment. And please remember to articulate the alignment of the delivery in a rational and convincing manner, because whatever you say in that, has to be supported with evidence. So, as mentioned in this previous slide, among other things, one of the main objectives of your PDP is to ascertain that you will be delivering a quality training that meets current and future industry needs. So the best way to ascertain that is to show that you will be delivering a quality training that meets current and future industrial needs. And that you can find it from the job outlook.

The department will provide you with a jobs and training needs report, or you might have it by now, and you are required to analyze your PDP as per these documents so you can align your PDP with the current and future industrial needs.

When you do comparison and analysis, please take into note Which one are the most popular qualifications? Which are the top occupation advertisers? Which are the Largest Employing Occupations? What are the largest employment industries and so on. And, not only that, not only the current stuff, but also you have to analyze the trajectory of the goals. For example, you can see the VET related employment by occupation and clusters from 2021 to 2031. That trajectory might give you, which qualifications are with the strong job outlook, or you can see in terms of apprenticeship and traineeship, which one courses have more apprenticeship commencement, which one were advertised more in SEEK. So this kind of comparison analysis will make your PDP strong and sound. During comparison and analysis, you are required to take into consideration your training location and the geographical location of the job and training needs. Not always one qualification is demanded in all areas. For example, if you see in the Gippsland summary, the most popular qualification are individual support, nursing, and infection control. Whereas if you see in the metropolitan areas, ECEC, individual support, and Disability are the most demanded quantification. So locations are also important when you do your comparison and analysis.

The next point is what are the important components in our submission that might be evaluated or assessed by the department?

One is the number of participants. In the portal, you must explain the estimated number of funded commencements that you’re expecting. And this has to be done quarterly. Quarter one, quarter two, quarter three, quarter four. It doesn’t go in bulk, it has to be allocated in quarters. And you can say quarter one I will take eight students, in quarter two I will have 15 students and so on, but note that not necessarily because you say the numbers, then you will be given those numbers, it depends on the department’s discretion. The second point is duration and intensity. In this section, information is required on the expected duration and intensity of the program, and they are required to explain the exact hours divided into program unit provided hours, also known as PUSH hours, and un-supervised hours. You have to differentiate which amounts are push hours, and which are unsupervised hours.

The third point is delivery mode. In the delivery mode you must indicate how prevalent a mode of student interaction is for the program. That means Face to face? Real-time? remote Self-paced remote (Other) The sum of these must equal 100.That means, what amount is face-to-face, what amount is real time, what other amount face to face and what, and amount is self-paced amount. But the sum of this must equal to 100. You can divide them, but take into account that you have to show the push hours, and then the delivery mode have to be in clear terms.

The last part is the delivery location. You might have one or two or three or four locations, but where is the location and what is the delivery of the quarter one, quarter two, quarter three of the participants. If you have 25% of the participants in location A, 75% of the participants in location B, you have to clearly explain why you’re doing that and where you’re going to do that.

Okay. Now how will you be assessed? In considering whether you are qualified to be selected, the department will assess whether you comply with the department’s requirement and really consider any issues arising from your due diligence. As part of this application, you are required to complete the due diligence request form. This is a very, very important form. And this due diligence request form consists of five sections. These five sections, you have to address them, articulate them, and you have to put correct information in that due diligence request form.

Next is areas that you will be assessing. Some people are asking if they can apply without the financial statement for confidentiality reasons. And the short answer is no, financial assessment is specified as mandatory documentation, and you will be required to submit your latest audited financial statements as it was explained in the introduction by Sukh. And this includes notes of the financial statement and the independent auditor’s report. And for this, I think the department has assigned an independent corporation. Equifax Australia Credit Ratings Pty Ltd, trading as Corporate Scorecard (ABN 33 007 527 611) is the nominated independent financial assessor for the 2022 Contracting Process and you are required to send them a financial assessment to Equifax Australia in which you will be assessed by them.

Can your expression of interest trigger an audit? May or may not. But What is sure is in considering whether you are qualified or not the Department will consider whether you comply with the Department’s requirements, and any issue/s arising from your due diligence. The Department will also consider your prior compliance and Quality conduct when assessing the suitability of the Applicant


Sukh Sandhu – So before we go to the timeline, I think I’ll say something on the previous slide as well. I mean,we were discussing that. Can your expression of interest trigger an audit? So, the thing is basically that any ideal, irrespective of whether they are applying for this expression of interest or not, they operate in , it doesn’t matter which state, or, which regulatory body under which regulatory body I think they need to be ready at any time to be audited by the regulatory bodies. So there should not be any surprise if an audit may, like you know, this expression of interest may trigger or may not trigger, but an audit can happen. So just to make sure that you are at your processes, operations, your systems, everything is 110% compliant, you follow regulatory and legislative guidelines at all times, and, like you know, you basically are like you know 110%, what are the requirements? What are your obligations? And if anyone from the department, or like you know, even consultants, basically they say oh, this is compliant, this is noncompliant. You can basically have the understanding to caution that judgment, to question basically that, okay, why is this compliant, why is this non-compliant? Can you show me if this is in return in any regulatory framework or guidelines, because that helps a lot. Like you know, and the auditor also understands, or the consultant who may help you. They also understand that you know what is happening and you are in control, not auditor, not a consultant but you. So, slide 23, the timeline. So Tuesday 31st of August, 2021 was the issue date, but there were contact notifications that were sent before this date. Friday, 1st of October, 2021, 5:00 PM Australian Eastern standard time is the closing time for expression of interest and the financial assessment process and submission of the relevant documentation. And before 31st of December, 2021, that department will communicate the outcome notifications. So in that summary section, we would strongly like to encourage that you comprehensively check everything, all the documentation, all the information is correct. Make sure that, like you know second person has also gone through, second or third person, whatever you are at, your system is, have gone through information, and you know basically, like you know that you are submitting a comprehensive documentation to department of education and training so that if they basically have any first to like, you know, they shouldn’t have a lot of questions, but if they have questions that, like you know, you can support those submission that you have made. And like you know, this is great opportunity basically. And we hope like you know, whoever is in the training industry they are here for right reasons, and one of the right reason is to make sure that our students, they are trained to get real jobs in the industry. And this skills first funding contract give you that opportunity to fulfill those student dreams. Stuart do we want to add anything in the summary section?


Stuart Newman – Yeah. Just a reminder that you read and understand the significant documents, including the 2022, the funding contract. And please prepare an audited financial statement, because that is one of the important documents. And please don’t forget to complete the due diligence requests form, because all the information that goes there will be assessed thoroughly. And the PDPs are very important, they have to reflect as accurately as possible, the nature and the quantity of the training delivered that you’re going to deliver in 2022. And the last point is the member submissions are only SVTS and in the required format. If it’s not in the required format, it is highly likely that they will send it back to you. So understand the format and please make sure that you do it via SVTS only. Thank you.


Sukh Sandhu – I think let’s move to our thank you slide. We appreciate your taking the time to participate in today’s session. We hope you took away some valuable information from today’s webinar. You may send an email to info@caqa.com.edu, or call us on 026-6160. If you want to attend one of our professional development workshops webinar and events, or sign up for one of our compliance retainer agreement service, or you want us to help you with internal audit or government funding application, or any other regulatory or risk management related matters, you can also contact us if you have any questions. My direct email address is sukh@careercalling.com.au, and Stuart’s email address is stuart@careercalling.com.au. So now we’ll move to some of your questions that we received throughout the session. And we have also received in the last few days as well. So depending upon that time, it is like, you know, almost 15, 16 minutes. Let’s see how many questions and answers, questions we can answer. So Stuart to you now.


Stuart Newman – Okay.


Sukh Sandhu – I think let’s start with the questions that we have received through emails first, and then we’ll come to the questions that we have here in the chat section.


Stuart Newman – Okay. Okay. So the first question is as follows:, I see in the eligibility criteria that my RTO must be based in Victoria, how about my students? Can I enroll students from other states?


Sukh Sandhu – No, all students must physically present in the state of Victoria at all times, and which they are undertaking the training and assessment and department has been very clear, not for the 2022 funding contract, but as you know, throughout all these contractual, all these contracts.


Stuart Newman – Okay. So the other question is from Melbourne. So the question was, I don’t have an account with SVTS. Can I mail my application to the department?


Sukh Sandhu – They don’t have an account with SVTS, and they want to mail the department?. No, expressions of interest must be submitted electronically through the SVTS system. A username and password are required to submit materials via SVTs. So if they do not have a username and password for SVTS, they can create a username and password by accessing the document, that is SVTS login user guide. They can access this at http://www.education.vic.gov.edu/svts. And like some of the articles, they may not even have their, like you know, account on SVTs, so they can like you know send email to the department and the department is quite responsive in creating those accounts, and then they can access all this information.


Stuart Newman – Okay. The next question is anonymous, there is no name in there, but the question is, can I include all the qualifications that I intend to deliver in one program delivery plan? I think he or she or they are asking if she or he can put all the qualifications, or the courses in one PDP.


Sukh Sandhu – No. They are required to submit a separate program delivery plan for each program skillset that they intend to deliver in 2022. Not only that, if they have a single program that is being delivered through different delivery modes, separate PDPs must be submitted. For example if in individual support, CHC33015, they offer, like you know, deliver through more than one delivery mode, then separate PDPs must be submitted for an apprenticeship, traineeship, non apprenticeship traineeship delivery. Or if it consists of distinct streams, more than one of which will be delivered separate PDPs again must be submitted for each stream.


Stuart Newman – Okay. So, okay. So even if it just steams for them, but if it is bracket aging, bracket home in community, even for that they will need to have a separate PDP.


Sukh Sandhu – Yes, absolutely.


Stuart Newman – Is that right, yep?


Sukh Sandhu – Yep.


Stuart Newman – Okay. Great. The next question reads as follows: I read on your website two lists of subjects in the 2022 provider selection process. Familiar with non foundations skills programs, can you explain please what the foundation skills program are? And can I deliver the courses on the list? So the question is about the foundation skills program in the list of 2022 subjects.


Sukh Sandhu – Foundation skills program means those qualifications and courses listed on department of education and training foundations skill list, which is published on skills Victoria training system, SVTS, and this list has been like, you know, they update this from time to time. In order to deliver foundation skills programs as identified on the 2022 funded course list and indicated on the 2022 specific programs list under the skills first VET funding contract, you must be included on the foundation skills approved provider list, and have the relevant approval to deliver that program. Suppose your organization seeks to be included on the foundation skills approved provider list, in that case you must indicate this in part three of the expression of interest on SVTS and submit program delivery plans for the relevant programs. You will be required to undergo a separate assessment process for inclusion on foundation skills approved provider list. The department will publish guidance on this process in the coming weeks, that is what my understanding is.


Stuart Newman – Okay. So if you are not in the provider list to deliver the foundation skills then there is no way that you will be approved for this.


Sukh Sandhu – No. So you have to be basically on that list to deliver foundation skills approved courses.


Stuart Newman – Okay. So the next question is as follows,’’we’re saying that all the applications have to be online. So this question is providing the AVETMISS report is one of the mandatory requirements, I understand that, however, I have not had a successful upload since first July, 2021. So do I have any other options’’?


Sukh Sandhu – Yes. So this organization, they have the net file option. They must supply AVETMISS compliant student statistical data by uploading net file, entity file in part two in SVTS. So through that, they basically can demonstrate compliance.


Stuart Newman – Okay. And this question is in relation to financial statements. So what he’s saying is, I don’t want to be disclosed in my financial statement, can i apply without the financial statements because this is confidential information that is only relevant to my company.


Sukh Sandhu – Yeah. And like you know, we have received a lot of emails regarding this as well, that if the department of education and training, like you know, they really need to see my financial statements and why they need to see those financial statements. And like you know, we have explained these to a lot of people as well and we have also said that they should contact the department of education and training for further information. But coming back to your answer, no, financial assessment is specified as mandatory documentation in that guide to 2022 and must be submitted by all training providers without exception. Documents must be submitted directly to the department’s nominated financial assessment. You can Google this email address as well and you can find it. If you want us to let you know this email address again, please send us an email, we will basically let you know this email address.


Stuart Newman – Yeah okay. So the next question is, actually he or she wants to guarantee success. So the question is what are the main factors that can guarantee the success of my application?


Sukh Sandhu – Well, nothing can guarantee the success of an application. A department in its absolute discretion that reminds which programs, qualifications, or skill sets nominated by the training provider through the various program delivery plans, PDPs, will be agreed for inclusion in that training provider’s funded scope. So like you know even if, basically like you know, you have consultants like us, even then like you know there is not 100% assurity that you’re going to, like you know, get success with your application. But, like you know, having consultants, they can help you find the gaps and make sure, like you know, your application is all filled, all complete to submit. The seasons made by the department through this assessment process will form part of any there contract. However, we can point out what you must ensure to have a successful application. And they are, your expression of interest is presented in that acquired format as Stuart has explained. All the information fields referred to in, like you know this call for expression of interest are completed and contain all the required information.


Stuart Newman – Okay. So the next question is relation to, what are the factors that the department will weigh when processing each application? I think they want to know the main factors although there are a number of factors, but what would be the factor that stands out when the department deals with the processing of each application?


Sukh Sandhu – But there are many of them, they include any matter contained in your expression of interest or other document submitted, documentary information submitted by the training provider, any information held by the department concerning the training provider, including but not limited to past utterance to data and reporting requirements. So compliance with all the data submission protocols, history of performance in current or previous contracts between the training, results of student and employer surveys that have been conducted by that training, conducted by the department of education and training, or any other regulatory body. And as you know, from the last few years, the federal government and state government share all information and data as well. So like you know, any information that they have that also is going to be one of the reasons to like you know, either approve or reject the application, and information provided by stakeholders of the department regarding the RTO information obtained by the department as it is sort of due diligence and inquiries, including but not limited to documents they reviewed, facilities at class time, observations made by the department or their agents, and communication with past or present clients of the training provider. Department may also take into account the results of its due diligence investigations and inquiries information obtained from communication with past and present clients, data submitted by you to state and Commonwealth agencies, any historical information available to department as we explained, and the current property standing of the training provider and its related entities, and any impact this standing may have on training providers ability to perform under a contract.


Stuart Newman – Okay. I think we have two minutes. The last question is, does skill first use the standards of four RTO 2015 as it’s basis of the audit? I think in other words the question is, what are the standards for the auditing when you’re audited by the department of education for the skill first fund training providers?


Sukh Sandhu – The department’s approach to provide monitoring is risk-based. This approach results in two streams of audit activity, the planned audit program, planned in advance through the annual audit review and targeted audit program triggered across the year in response to emerging issues and identified risks. The department uses a range of audit types, and the reviews to support training programs, training providers, to maximize their performance and ensure that contractual requirements are met. The basic type of audit those department conduct under the planned audit program, they are the business process audit, so that is BPA in short, and the transactional compliance audit, that is TCA. The BPA audit is designed as a walk through examination of a training provider, key business processes and systems to identify areas of weakness relating to its compliance with the funding associated aspects of the contract, and also with the particular reference to those elements of the contract, and that underpin the delivery of quality training and assessment services. The TCA on the other hand focuses on funding assurance and examines a relatively small sample of transactions to identify instances of non-compliance at a transactional level. The skill first audit is conducted based on the 2022 standard VET funding contract skills first program, as well as the RTO standards.


Stuart Newman – Okay. Just one question, how does the funding model work? So this is related to the funding model on the payments.


Sukh Sandhu – Well this question is related more to post approval procedure. However it will be like, you know, I can address this briefly, that department issues every year a funding model and rate. The subsidy rate, per hour, depend on several factors, including the type of training delivery, non apprenticeship, traineeship, RPL or traineeship, and the total nominal hours. It ranges from $1.31 cents to 14.25 per hour. For example, like you know, if you consider advanced diploma of professional screenwriting, the maximum payable hours is 1455 at $5.25 subsidy rate per hour for non apprenticeship traineeship, and at $1.31 for RPL delivery. The department revises every year the funding model for example starting 1st of January, 2022, the base subsidy rate for courses, skillsets and course on the FCL and FSSL will increase by 25 cents, so $0.25 cent per training program delivery hour, per student. This might look minor change, but when you see at the macro economy level, it equates to approximately 84 million over four years.


Stuart Newman – Okay, good. Yeah. So that was the final question Sukh.


Sukh Sandhu – Well we received a lot of other questions, as well. Those were asked through social media. And there are some questions through over chat as well. So I think let’s address these questions one by one offline. So thank you so much everyone for being part of today’s webinar. If you have any questions, please feel free to email us at info@caqa.com.au. You can email directly to Stuart or to me as well these questions. Thank you so much for your time and listening to us today.


The recording and powerpoint presentation is available at SKills First Recording and Skills First Presentation